Wednesday, December 13, 2006

The Pay Raise - $2000 per year +, not enough?

There have been comments made to the extent of "talk to a teacher" to really understand why we have gone eleven months and can't have a contract agreed upon between the NASD and NAEA.

For the past several months all the people have heard is that the healthcare is the worst in the valley, the pay is not sufficient, planning time is deficient, and many other negatives toward the NASD offer.

Finally, with the fact finders report we receive some information related to the NAEA's requests. What we find is that they want every demand met, or no contract. Further, what we find is the system works in their favor. If they strike they receive no long-term penalty. They will get their entire salary because they are obligated to work a full year. Pushing the envelope, they will probably get more than the NASD offer and less than they want if it goes to binding arbitration, but at least they get more that way then settling.

When you get down to it, this is no different than any other issue - it is about the money.

So what kind of money are we talking about?

I went to the NAEA web site and recorded the salaries per step in the 2005-2006 Master Level, then to the recommended salary schedule from the fact finder report. Steps represent increases based on years served. There is no additional time, workload, or responsibilities. These are raises based on time served. Additionally, the more credits and degree you have the higher your pay. These credits are reimbursed by the district and paid by the taxpayer.

Here is what we are looking at:
  • 2005-2006 Step 1 with a Masters Degree: $39,500
  • 2006-2007 Step 2 with a Masters Degree: $42,200 (+ $2700, + $2700)
  • 2007-2008 Step 3 with a Masters Degree: $ 44,730 (+ $2530, + $5230)
  • 2008-2009 Step 4 with a Masters Degree: $46,740 (+ $2010, + $7240)
  • 2009-2010 Step 5 with a Masters Degree: $ 49,500 (+ $2760, + $10,000)
  • 2010-2011 Step 6 with a Masters Degree: $ 51,630 (+ $2130, + $12,130)
How many people could be guaranteed employment and raises totaling $12,130 over six years with no consideration for performance, no increase in work day, responsibilities, and duties and say it is not enough?

So let's start at the 5th Step:
  • 2005-2006 Step 5 with a Masters Degree: $42,133
  • 2006-2007 Step 3 with a Masters Degree: $ 43,500 (+ $1367, + $ 1367)
  • 2007-2008 Step 4 with a Masters Degree: $ 46,125 (+ $2625, + $ 3992)
  • 2008-2009 Step 5 with a Masters Degree: $ 48,600 (+ $2475, + $ 6447)
  • 2009-2010 Step 6 with a Masters Degree: $ 51,390 (+ $2790, + $ 9237)
  • 2010-2011 Step 7 with a Masters Degree: $ 53,755 (+ $2365, + $ 11,602)
Again, how many people could be guaranteed employment and raises totaling $11,602 over six years (this reflects compacting - still a considerable increase) with no consideration for performance, no increase in work day, responsibilities, and duties and say it is not enough?

There is a grievance over the healthcare issue, and the contribution to the benefits is minuscule (I pay 20% of the cost of the plan I chose, so $50 a month would be nothing). The prep time and other issues are clearly insignificant compared to salary. If they weren't the salary would have been conceded to and it hasn't moved.

The NASD and Fact Finder have offered significant increases to the NAEA and they have resoundingly turned it down. The questions left to ask is how much more do they want, what are they willing to do to get it, and how much damage to their reputation are they willing to suffer to get it.

It is really a sad state of affairs right now and I can wholly sympathize with the people who started Stop Teachers Strikes in PA. The process given to us is in place to ruin communities and needs to be changed. The PSEA has legislated this process to ensure their own well-being, now it is time for another community to realize how damaging this process has become, unfortunately, it is our own.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I appreciate your article about the NASD teacher's negotiations and their demands. I thank you for sympathizing with our community as we did go through a month long strike last year and as you stated,it does create hostility . Looking back as a community we are glad it is over and hope all they went through this has learned that by striking doesn't solve the problem it creates bigger ones.

Anonymous said...

Thanks to the wired world in which we live today, the common person knows a lot more information today than our parents knew when we were kids when there were contract negotiations going on.

Both side have to a degree skewed the argument in their favor, and both sides have launched personal attacks.

In the end, our children have become the pawns in this nasty game of chess being played out between the NAEA and the district.

Both sides have made major blunders.

The NAEA is asking for pay and benefits that go far beyond what the taxpaying community see. Guaranteed substantial pay increases, a full pension, and a very limited contribution to benefits (even if they accept the district offered percentage, it is way below the prevailing average).

The district award huge pay increases to the administrators. Not only was this unwarranted, but the timing was absolutely stupid in light of knowing they were up for negotiations with the NAEA on a new contract.

I think the moderator's analysis spells it out quite clearly that there is an extremely good offer on the table. One that anyone that is unemployed or working in a low paying job would love to have.

I also think the board should rescind the pay raises given to the administrators, or at least decrease them by a substantial amount. Yes, they run the district on a day to day basis, but then again, they are not on the front lines providing our children an education.

After all, there should be a give and take on negotiations, and things should be equitable across the board.

We are all waiting for the other shoe to drop regarding if the teachers are going to strike or not. I have to believe that this is having a direct effect on the students as well as the teachers in the classroom. To believe otherwise is unrealistic.

I suggest to every parent to go out and sign the ePetition to outlaw stikes. Also make sure to tell your friends and neighbors. Only when we can get legislation like this enacted can we take our children out of the equation as pawns.

RossRN said...

You don't need a low paying job to think this is a good offer.

If you had a four year degree, got your first job at 22, had your employer pay for your masters degree in full, and were able to make over $50,000 before you turned 30, while working less than 8 hours a day for 192 days, and knew you had a guaranteed job and guaranteed pay raises with no increase in reponsibilities for the next five years, you'd be doing pretty good.

It boils down to choices. When you chose to teach you do so knowing that you have a public position, public contract, and that there is a salary range within which you'll be paid.

There are trade-offs, the guaranteed employment and pension are worth their weight in gold compared to jobs that offer no pension, maybe a 401k in which the company contributes, and the ability of employers to tell your job is over with no notice or that the company is moving its operations to an area with cheaper labor (either in or out of the country).

To be holding out on roughly a quarter of a percent at this point is ridiculous (and yes its driving me nuts;-)